BBC：如果收到合适的报价，热刺愿意出售约翰逊（BBC：若报价到位，热刺愿放行约翰逊）

Considering Spurs' potential sale

If Spurs are thinking about selling in December 2025, I should avoid creating numbers and instead think about common reasons clubs decide to sell. These can include Financial Fair Play, squad balance, and whether a player is homegrown. Since he trained at Nottingham Forest, he's recognized as homegrown for the Premier League. With competition from players like Kulusevski, Son, and Richarlison, the context for 2025 is uncertain. The user might want a quick summary or key points from the original report. Should I ask if they want more details?Analyzing potential Spurs sale

在买家通 \n

It’s not safe to provide exact figures like £24-25 million or £23-24 million, so I’ll keep the analysis general. Potential buyers might include Premier League teams looking for homegrown right wingers or forwards, like Newcastle or West Ham, but I won’t name uncertain clubs—just describe the types.

Regarding Spurs, I’ll consider competition on the right flank and tactical impacts. I’ll estimate that suitable offers could be over £40-50 million based on previous fee structures without hallucinating numbers. Should I ask if the user wants the original source or an analysis of pros and cons?

要点

可内外线摆 \n

基在右路 \n

这更像“倾听报价”而非主动清洗；热刺通常会把“合适”理解为能覆盖账面价值并带溢价的报价。

超内部买卖 \n

约翰逊（Brennan Johnson）定位为边锋/前锋，冲击力强、无球跑动好；与库卢塞夫斯基在右路存在位置重叠，若资金回笼可用于补强其他位置，这类消息就会出现。
财务角度：据公开报道他2023年转会费约4700–5000万英镑、长约分摊摊销。粗算每年摊销约800万英镑；两年后账面价值仍在3000万英镑上下，因此“合适报价”大概率需要在此之上、并带一定溢价（常见区间可能是4字头起步）。这是估算逻辑，不代表BBC原文数字。
潜在买家通常是需要英超本土培养名额、缺少右路突破点或需要可内外线摆动前锋的球队；英超内部买卖也利于卖方议价。
对热刺影响：若出售，右路会更倚重库卢塞夫斯基/内锋化人选；若不引援，边路轮换深度会受影响。